| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Stop wasting time looking for files and revisions. Connect your Gmail, DriveDropbox, and Slack accounts and in less than 2 minutes, Dokkio will automatically organize all your file attachments. Learn more and claim your free account.

View
 

Group Support Systems

Page history last edited by Claire 2 years ago

Team members:

Claire Lassausaie

Matthew Pellerito

John Plavsic

 

Virtual Group Support Systems in the Global Village

 

 

  1. Introduction

 

Group Support Systems (GSS) are a virtualized means of optimizing interactions amongst a collective of users. Each GSS provides a distinctive interface that in some way streamlines a particular process to further a group’s mission. Business team members, activists, students, entrepreneurs, and enthusiasts can log on to different GSS from almost every part of the world and come together to engage.

 

GSS offer shared topics of discussion, voting systems, video conferencing, live streams, forums, and anonymity. GSS are used by groups mainly for decision-making purpose and allow members to participate online rather than having face-to-face meetings. GSS contribute to more efficient decision-making by improving communication and collaboration, providing online platforms where participants can brainstorm, discuss each others’ ideas, as well as voting and prioritizing those ideas. To some extent, GSS can provide virtual meeting tools and other advanced communicative functionalities, but to be considered GSS, products need to gather the three following characteristics: shared list building, discussion, and tools for voting/prioritization.

 

The way that GSS’s allow for organized data to be displayed intends to enable a low-perceptual load and high-user friendliness so to maximize the simplicity of comprehension within the group of users thereby facilitating collective decisions and actions being made. The drawback of a GSS platform tends to be the learning-curve and high-conceptual load required to navigate the tools before they are actually applied and filled in with information (so it is easy for non-expert users of the program to navigate when the information has been filled in already, but it’s confusing to actually fill in the information and have it be organized according to the specific process that the particular GSS platform enables). Often, a “facilitator” will be hired or designated as the leader and expert for guiding the group through the GSS processes. They take responsibility for organizing the information.

 

For our project, we chose the virtual group support system domain because we find this domain fairly important as it gives a platform to unheard masses that don’t have access to upper echelons of power. For the first part of the project, we will list three user stories that present a specific communication need and how specific GSS fulfill those needs.

 

 

  1. User stories

 

    1. Context and methodology

 

This section provides three user stories representing three potential real-life situations where a team or a group could use a GSS to optimize their processes towards collective goals. In order to write the user stories, we used our personal experiences and background to write the user stories and we followed the “As a <role> we want <to do> so that <value>” method which highlights an actor, an action, and an achievement, to make it clear what the GSS is supposed to accomplish for each user story. This is completed by a list of acceptance criteria that define what the system should allow the group to do.

 

 

    1. First user story

 

Context:

The first user story revolves around social activism and the sharing of ideas globally and locally. In today's day and age topics like global warming, metoo, and wars are in many discussions. Unheard voices of activists and crusaders around the world need to be heard and discussed. Many are living in governments that openly censor specific statements and news.

 

User story:

As an activist group recently formed with members from everywhere in the US to discuss and raise voices about the different issues we are concerned about, we want to be able to share our ideas all together regardless of where we are located in the country so that we can decide when to organize our next protest, what message we want to spread, using what tool, and where to organize it.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • We need a platform that can continuously be used by all our members, regardless our time and place difference.

  • We need a platform that provides anonymity.

  • We need a meeting scheduling tool.

  • We need voting and trending on specific issues so that members know what is of importance.

  • We need a platform to brainstorm on different impacting messages to display during the protest.

  • We need to be able to rank the ideas to narrow it down to a selection.

  • We need easy access via pc and mobile app.

  • We need a platform that can support more than 100 participants at a time.

  • We need live streaming available from protests, meetings, and speeches.

 

 

    1. Second user story

 

Context:

The second user story pertains to entrepreneurs, co-op business owners, and consumers. Many around the world, especially in the third world, have business savvy ideas and motives. They are inventing and creating new products and business which need funding, commercials, and public opinion.

 

User story:

As a group of international venture capitalists, we are deciding on how to manage our current investment portfolio and want a seamless way to vote amongst ourselves so as to be as clear and concise in our decision-making. There is word out on a hot new tech startup, BionX that is looking for VC funding for an innovative AI technology. Their tech, however, might render, InfoMapCo, our currently invested tech company’s product to be obsolete while that company has also not yet gone to market or brought in any profit. This new tech start-up could kill our successful exit with InfoMapCo. Both companies will be competing with each other, but BionX has an experimental approach that is very expensive to sustain and it is very unclear as to whether it may take many years for it to actually work or if it will function well enough in the next few months to come to market. We want a way to juxtapose documents and calculated risks in our long-term financial decisions so that we can ascertain the potential impact of our choice. Our research team says they have compiled research that indicates the decision to fund the startup would be disastrous if it fails in the long-run. We want a simple way for our team to display the information so that we can come to an informed decision. Our VC firm is located in Silicon Valley, but none of us are actually present in the same location. Since we are dispersed throughout the world and are not all simultaneously awake or in similar time-zones, we would like a scheduling mechanism that can synchronize meeting times so that we can plan to meet effortlessly (and preferably via video chat).

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • We need to create a list of pros and a list of cons where everyone can give ideas on why they think a company should be kept or not.

  • We need to be able to upload documents and display data supporting our arguments.

  • We need to be able to schedule meetings and agree on times throughout time-zone disparities.

  • We need a system with algorithms to track financial figures in decision-making.

  • We need a voting board with comments and suggestions.

  • We need encrypted channels for information assurance (security).

 

 

    1. Third user story

 

Context:

The third user story is for the production team of TV shows and cinema. Plenty of decisions and possibilities need to be established. Examples of needs include a prioritized list of who to cast for a role, having possible alternative storylines written out then selecting which best fits, mapping out the different effects adding certain elements might have on the story and as a setup for future plotlines. Perhaps comparing different design choices, juxtaposing the possibilities and having people vote/weigh their opinions as well as provide

 

User story:

As an entertainment company, Superscope Productions just got greenlighted for the production of a TV show featuring a teenage drama plot that is still being scripted. Our writers are not all located in the same place physically, so we want a way to be able to storyboard virtually and share ideas regarding plot and character development. We have several options for lead and supporting actors as well as locations to film and want a way for our casting agents to make decisions clearly and seamlessly on whom to utilize. Our team needs to be able to share media and supporting documents so to visualize the decisions being considered. We also want our costume designers to share their design ideas for the producers to approve so there is no confusion in the overall vision of the characters coming together. We want tools for the budget to be accounted for and managed so that the decisions made will lead to a profitable release rather than barely breaking-even.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • We need to schedule meetings virtually for the team as well as walk-on personnel.

  • We need to upload/download profiles of potential actors for casting directors to choose from.

  • Writers need to be able to share potential plot points and collaboratively synthesize a storyline.

  • Costume designers need to be able to share images of designs for producers to vote on.

  • Producers must be able to track the budget.

  • We need space for up to 150 persons (as involved in production).

 

 

  1. List of products

 

    1. Context and methodology

 

This section provides a table for each product we found that matched the GSS definition. We searched the Internet for products having the main characteristics of a GSS, namely list-building mechanisms where users can engage, discuss and evaluate content; multi-criteria decision-making systems; communication channels; and voting features. For each product, we went on the website, looked for general information and more details about the available features so we could have a comprehensive list allowing a good understanding of the possibilities offered by each provider. Most systems have a demo or a free trial that we could have access to in order to understand better the way they work and reflect it in the following tables. However, not all products provide the same amount of information regarding their features and how to use them so all tables are not equally descriptive. The products were not attributed a subdomain since they were found to pretty much provide the same features, but vary in the way the users interact with the system.

 

 

    1. List

 

PRODUCT

Stormboard

URL

https://stormboard.com

FEATURES

Stormboard is used for problem-solving and reaching new opportunities.

How it works:

  • Storm: an administrator creates a new storm, using one of the templates and invite other members to start brainstorming and collaborating.

  • Sticky notes: participants can add sticky notes for their ideas where they can share multimedia content, and they can edit them later. They can also create whiteboard and index cards.

  • Prioritization: once members have added sticky notes to the storm, they can vote on it and add comments, which supports decision making and prioritization of ideas.

  • Import: the members can import external documents like Excel spreadsheets for example.

  • Chat: discussion tool.

  • Tasks: the administrator can assign tasks so that the group’s roles and responsibilities are clear.

  • Activity: this feature allows members to keep track of what is happening.

  • Reports: the reporting feature can be used to have an overview of the ideas status, with their votes and comments.

Stormboard provides templates for a large range of needs and type of work, for instance: brainstorming, problem-solving, calendar, product management, engineering, agile, kaizen or lean methodologies…

Stormboard provides access to other platforms including Microsoft Office for co-editing online.  

PRICING

/user/month

  • Personal: $0

Limited access, maximum of five users.

  • Startup: $5

Unlimited participants.

  • Business: $10 or $8.33 when billed annually

Unlimited participants and access to additional features.

  • Enterprise: (contact them for pricing)

Access to all the features.

 

 

PRODUCT

GroupMap

URL

https://www.groupmap.com

FEATURES

GroupMap is used for planning, brainstorming, discussing and making decisions.

How it works:

  • Map: a member starts a new activity using one of the templates and invites the other team members.

  • Customize: the administrator can customize the process by adding and removing steps within several options, such as brainstorm, rate, survey, group, vote, result...

  • Collaboration: participants go through the chosen process, they give ideas, those can be commented on and can be prioritized thanks to several features that allow members to vote, rate, like/dislike, and sort ideas.

  • Report: based on the group’s answer, a pattern, a common idea, is identified and display in a report to support the decision making.  

GroupMap provides templates for different types of decisions or activities, for instance: agile, SWOT analysis, risk assessment, stakeholder analysis etc…

PRICING

/month

  • Basic: $20

1 map creator, up to 10 participants per map and basic use of the functionalities.

  • Professional: $60

1 map creator, up to 50 participants per map and advanced use of the functionalities.

  • Organization: from $100

Multiple map creator, unlimited participants.

 

 

PRODUCT

1000minds

URL

https://www.1000minds.com

FEATURES

1000minds offers 4 categories of tools for different types of decision-making situations.

How it works:

  • Decision-making and prioritization: based on the ranking.

  • Value for money: this feature can be used as part of the decision-making and prioritization process when decisions involving money need to be made, such as budget, investments, resource allocation…

  • Conjoint analysis: used to survey members and understand their preferences when making choices.

  • Group decision-making: the features include conducting surveys among the participants, voting, ranking, categorizing.

1000minds can support an unlimited number of participants.

1000minds uses the PAPRIKA method which consists of answering several questions by choosing between two alternatives.

PRICING

The client has to contact them mentioning how they intend to use the platform so they can adjust the price to their needs.

 

PRODUCT

Stormz

URL

https://stormz.me/en

FEATURES

How it works: 

  • Workshops: the leader can create quizzes to train or test participants.

  • Report: this tool displays results with charts and reports on PDF, Word or Excel. 

  • “The Socializer”: discussion tool.

  • “The Event”: this tool brings together workshops, quizzes, and discussions of a team.

More than 50 workshops templates are available to share ideas, brainstorm, comment, vote and evaluate for decision-making.

Stormz is available in 6 languages.

PRICING

/month/user

  • Standard Plan: $15 for 10 participants, then $10 per additional participant.

  • Stormz Box: Contact them for prices. No need for network connection and the hardware is provided.

 

PRODUCT

Loomio

URL

https://www.loomio.org

FEATURES

How it works:

  • Proposal: discussion tool to share ideas.

  • Scheduling: time poll to plan meetings.

  • Polls and prioritization: voting tool.

Loomio has a Slack integration.

PRICING

/month

  • Free:

One group with a maximum of 10 members, discussions and decisions tools.

  • Gold: $39

Maximum 100 members, additional slack integration, subgroups, category tags, and data export.

  • Pro: $149

Maximum 1000 members and 10 groups.

  • Special prices for non-profit organizations.

 

PRODUCT

MeetingSphere

URL

https://www.meetingsphere.com

FEATURES

How it works: 

  • Brainstorm: an interactive way of sharing ideas and opinion, editing them, categorizing them, and commenting on other participant’s ideas. Unread comments are highlighted and the number of comments is displayed.

  • Discussion: several topics can be discussed in parallel, participants can navigate between the different topics posted by the leader and choose to contribute to them by replying the main question or someone else’s comment.

  • Rating: participants can rate items and get results in tables or charts.

  • Voice conference: up to 200 callers.

  • Video screen sharing.

  • Reports in Word or Excel.

Members can participate anonymously so everyone is comfortable saying what they think.

PRICING

/month

  • MeetingSphere One: $49

  • MeetingSphere Pro: $99

Both allow unlimited meetings and participants.

 

PRODUCT

LucidMeetings

URL

https://www.lucidmeetings.com

FEATURES

LucidMeetings is a GSS more focused on meetings management. 

The available features depend on the type of users and the plan they choose.

Personal:

  • Capacity: 1 meeting host, up to 10 meeting participants, 1 meeting room.

  • Features: Meeting scheduling and invitations, agendas and meeting notes, professional meeting records, action items, decisions, issues, Skype meetings.

Business:

  • Capacity: up to 50 meeting hosts, 500 team members, 200 participants per meeting, and unlimited rooms.

  • Features: same as personal plan, additional integrations, audio conferencing, screen sharing, alerts and reminder, templates, workflow, user management.

Enterprise:

  • Capacity: unlimited.

  • Features: same as the business plan, additional training, database, custom branding, and single sign-on.

PRICING

/month

  • 1 Meeting Host: $19

  • 3 Meeting Hosts: $39

  • 5 Meeting Hosts: $59

  • 10 Meeting Hosts: $99

  • 25 Meeting Hosts: $229

  • 50 Meeting Hosts: $399

  • 100 Meeting Hosts: $699

 

PRODUCT

ThinkTank

URL

https://thinktank.net/product/

FEATURES

How it works:  

  • Digital Forum: discussion tool.

  • Collaboration Toolkit: ranking and voting, file sharing, reporting.

  • Smart Templates.

  • Session director: workshop planning.

  • Collective intelligence: keep records of the work done using ThinkTank.

Members can participate anonymously. 

PRICING

The clients need to contact them to know the prices.

 

PRODUCT

Collaborate.org

URL

https://collaborate.org/home

FEATURES

Collaborate.org is linking individuals together worldwide to focus on a certain cause.

How it works:

  • Create groups: an individual can start creating a group to gather people that are passionate about particular causes that are going on throughout the world and sharing solutions, ideas and advice to these causes.

  • Tools: dashboards, members, video conferences, visualization tools, task list, calendars and more.

Over 2 million data is provided in education, health, community outreach, conservation, research etc. There is 3D world viewer that allows people to zoom in anywhere on the planet and see all the data about any location. 

PRICING

Collaborate.org seems free, participants only need to sign up.

 

PRODUCT

PowerNoodle

URL

https://www.powernoodle.com

FEATURES

PowerNoodle is used to improve the decision-making quality.

How it works: 

  • Template: the Organizer chooses a template and invites participants.

  • Decision: using the appropriate template, the decision-making process is made easier. Participants can contribute, an explanation is provided for each template on how to work on it.  

  • Tools: common tools that are often available are "noodle" (share ideas), categorizing/combining, voting, ratings, prioritizing, and developing an action plan. 

PowerNoodle provides templates in different categories including risk management, strategy, change and transformation, process and quality, project and portfolio, and innovation and R&D.  

Participation is anonymous. 

PRICING

PowerNoodle is free, participants only need to sign up.

 

PRODUCT

Balloonr

URL

https://balloonr.com

FEATURES

Balloonr is used to share information and make decisions.

How it works: 

  • Brainstorming: collect ideas from participants and feedbacks.

  • Collaborating: participants can collaborate and build on those ideas.

  • Voting: they can vote on the ideas.

  • Report: the team can get an insight once they're done to make decisions. 

Participation is anonymous. 

PRICING

Balloonr seems free, participants only need to sign up.

 

PRODUCT

FacilitatePro

URL

https://www.facilitate.com

FEATURES

FacilitatePro helps team members to share their ideas without being scared of judgment, it makes room for everyone to speak freely and as much as they want, unlike meetings where some members tend to monopolize the discussion due to personality differences. FacilitePro makes meetings more interactive and productive so groups can share, organize and prioritize their ideas in order to support decision-making.

How it works:

  • Brainstorm and capture ideas: create a list out of the participants’ ideas that they can share anonymously.

  • Build on ideas: participants comment on each others’ ideas.

  • Categorize: organize the ideas as common groups or themes can be identified.

  • Prioritize: participants can give thumbs up to ideas they deem important and interesting to prioritize the ideas from the list.

  • Evaluate: participants can evaluate and vote on ideas choosing among several types of voting methods, such as a checkbox, ranking, rating, etc.

  • Decide: based on the results from the voting, the list of ideas is updated to show the order of prioritization so everyone can easily identify the most important items.

  • Document: a report is available.

PRICING

/year

FacilitatePro for individuals:

  • Basic: $299

1 conference, 5 concurrent topics, 12 participants, brainstorm, comment, poll with thumbs up.

  • Plus: $999

1 conference, 10 concurrent topics, 25 participants, brainstorm, comment, poll with thumbs up, categorize, voting (select from 15 methods), voting results.

  • Premium: $2,495

10 conferences, 100 concurrent topics, 50 participants, brainstorm, comment, poll with thumbs up, categorize, voting (select from 25 methods), voting results, customization of what participants can do or see.

  • Pro: $4,995

25 conferences, 250 concurrent topics, 250 participants, brainstorm, comment, poll with thumbs up, categorize, advanced voting (select from 30 methods), voting results, customization of what participants can do or see, select agenda templates, share and conduct concurrent conferences, build surveys.


FacilitatePro for enterprises:

  • Small Business: $9,995

  • Medium Business: $24,995

  • Enterprise: $49,995

 

 

  1. Products evaluation

 

    1. Context and methodology

 

In order to evaluate GSS products against the user stories, we selected three products from the product list based on how easy they were to access for us as students. In addition, we chose products that we think would be interesting and likely for us to work with later in companies. Meeting Sphere, for instance, is one of the leading GSS product on the market. After selecting three GSS products, we started using each of them as if we were experiencing each user story, having a facilitator creating a new workspace for the group and everyone trying to use the system following the acceptance criteria so we could know if the program provides the features needed and evaluate them on how easy they are to use for example. Having chosen three products, we could also determine which one fits the best each user story to provide a better understanding of the products as a result of this work.

 

    1. Evaluation

 

In this section, we provide a table for each user story showing whether the chosen products meet the acceptance criteria and how. The products we evaluate are the following: GroupMap, MeetingSphere, and Stormboard.

 

First user story:

 

Acceptance criteria

GroupMap

MeetingSphere

Stormboard

We need a platform that can continuously be used by all our members, regardless our time and place difference.

The facilitator can create a “map” and invite members using their email, sharing the map ID or a link. Users can access and contribute whenever they want from every device with a network connection and a modern web browser. All work done on GroupMap is automatically saved so the participants can come back to it later.

The leader can create a “meeting” opened for a certain period of time and share the URL with the participants so they can access it. After the end date, the meeting is closed and no longer accessible to the members. Within this period of time, they can participate in the activities whenever they want.  

Once the administrator created a “storm”, he can share it with the participants using a link, an email address, or an ID and KEY of the storm. Then the users can contribute whenever they want. The work is automatically saved so they can work on it later.

We need a platform that provides anonymity.

The facilitator can choose to make everyone anonymous when they participate and all the work done on GroupMap is private to the group.

The leader can choose to enforce anonymity for the activities.

The administrator of a board can choose the make the contribution anonymous.

We need a meeting scheduling tool.

GroupMap doesn’t offer anything related to virtual meetings. Everything happens on the map.

The leader can schedule a meeting and participants will receive a link so they can sign in.

The leader can use the calendar template to schedule meeting.

We need voting and trending on specific issues so that members know what is of importance.

People can start posting ideas and every user can comment on them, like or dislike them, and vote.

The leader can create a discussion activity, with several topics for discussion where participants can share their ideas, comment on them, but not voting form here. The leader can create a rating activity using the main ideas from the discussion or brainstorming session and ask participants to rate them. Different types of rating are available.

Participants can vote on ideas, as well as commenting on them.

We need a platform to brainstorm on different impacting messages to display during the protest.

GroupMap has many different types of templates that the facilitator can choose to create a “map” that suits this need.

The leader can create a brainstorming activity and invite participants.

The administrator can create a “storm” using one of the templates provided that suits the user’s need and invites the members so they can give their ideas.

We need to be able to rank the ideas to narrow it down to a selection.

GroupMap allows the facilitator to customize the process between brainstorming and reporting by adding steps. The options include ranking, which can also be customized. The report shows the ideas that received the most voting.

The leader can use the ranking tool to ask participants to rank ideas, choosing among several types of rating tools like scales for example.

There is no ranking feature available on Stormboard but it could be substituted with voting. The administrator can assign as many votes per participants as he wants so they can distribute them among ideas.

We need easy access via pc and mobile app.

No application but GroupMap works on pc and phone using all web browsers.

MeetingSphere is accessible from a computer using a web browser. Some browsers such as Safari don’t support the screen sharing feature.

Stormboard has a mobile application and is available on every device through a web browser.

We need a platform that can support more than 100 participants at a time.

The “Organization” plan allows unlimited participants.

MeetingSphere can support unlimited participants.

Unlimited participants as long as they don’t use the “Personal” plan.

We need live streaming available from protests, meetings, and speeches.

GroupMap doesn’t have a streaming feature.

MeetingSphere provides a meeting tool, with screen sharing, audio conferencing, live chat. Using the meeting tool, the leader opens the activities to the participants, but it is not a meeting platform like Skype for example.

Stormboard doesn’t have a streaming feature.

 

Second user story:

 

Acceptance criteria

GroupMap

MeetingSphere

Stormboard

We need to create a list of pros and a list of cons where everyone can give ideas on why they think a company should be kept or not.

GroupMap allows the facilitator to choose a template that fits the purpose of the decision-making, such as pros and cons list and SWOT analysis in this case.

There’s a rating workspace and a discussion workspace.

Stormboard has several templates that the administrator can choose, such as SWOT or a brainstorm/blank template. There is also a feature available to split left/right the template so it can be adapted to a pros/cons situation.

We need to be able to upload documents and display data supporting our arguments.

Users can add a file to support the arguments given in pros and cons for example.

MeetingSphere provides for importing data from other applications and for exporting data for further processing in other applications.

The users can add files, images, and videos to an idea/sticky note.

We need to be able to schedule meetings and agree on times throughout time-zone disparities.

GroupMap doesn’t offer anything related to virtual meetings. Everything happens on the map.

There is a group scheduling mechanism and it adjusts according to the users' time-zones plus video chat features for meetings.

There is a group scheduling mechanism with the calendar template and it adjusts according to the users' time-zones but it cannot hold meetings on the platform.

We need a system with algorithms to track financial figures in decision-making.

There are tools for accounting for risk and financial consequences.

This feature is not available on MeetingSphere.

This feature is not available on Stormboard.

We need a voting board with comments and suggestions

GroupMap allows the facilitator to customize the process between brainstorming and reporting by adding steps. The options include ranking, which can also be customized. The report shows the ideas that received the most voting.

MeetingSphere has a rating tool which is separate from the discussion tool, but participants could also use the live chat.

Stormboard has sticky notes that you can vote on and a sticky note that has not received votes will show a zero.

We need encrypted channels for information assurance (security)

All communications with and between GroupMap servers is encrypted using industry-standard Transport Layer Security.

The server's SSD drive can be encrypted with Symantec Drive Encryption.

Everything in Stormboard is transmitted over a SSL encrypted connection so no one can intercept your ideas.

 

Third user story:

 

Acceptance criteria

GroupMap

MeetingSphere

Stormboard

We need to schedule meetings virtually for the team as well as walk-on personnel.

This feature is not available on GroupMap.

There is a group scheduling mechanism and it adjusts according to the users' time-zones plus video chat features for meetings.

There is a group scheduling mechanism and it adjusts according to the users' time-zones but it cannot hold meetings on the platform.

We need to upload/download profiles of potential actors for casting directors to choose from.

Groupmap has an “add attachments to an idea” option for files to be uploaded.

It is possible to import and export data on MeetingSphere from other applications.

Stormboard allows the users to add an image, upload a document, or link a video.


Writers need to be able to share potential plot points and collaboratively synthesize a storyline.

Writers can use and connect nodes to create potential storylines to include different possible outcomes in a flowchart-like manner which can be collaboratively augmented by other users.

MeetingSphere has an option to promote ideas, comments or contributions.


Writers can suggest plot points via sticky notes and can comment on each to create a discussion thread where the writers collaboratively assess story details.

Costume designers need to be able to share images of designs for producers to vote on.

Groupmap has ”How Now Wow” matrix which is an idea selection tool. It can be used for rating and picture upload.

It is possible to import and export data on MeetingSphere from other applications and they can be voted on.

Stormboard allows the users to add an image, upload a document, or link a video and they can be voted on.


Producers must be able to track the budget.

This feature is not available on GroupMap.

This feature is not available on MeetingSphere.

This feature is not available on Stormboard.

We need space for up to 150 persons (as involved in production).

Customizable / unlimited.

Customizable / unlimited.

Customizable / unlimited.

 

 


 

References:

 

Management Study. (2016, December 16). Group Decision Support System (GDSS): Components, Features and Software Tools. Retrieved from https://www.managementstudyhq.com/features-and-components-of-group-decision-support-system.html

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.